|
|
|
The image shows somewhat lighter, yet distinct, vertical straight line arising from the top front of the he. It has a very odd shape for a geresh-muqdam. The order of the markings below the he is sheva then meteg then patah. Add a note 't' indicating transcription problem with geresh-muqdam marking.
BHL has no geresh-muqdam on the he; the order of the markings below the he is sheva then meteg then patah. BHLA has no entry for this verse.
| Ben Denckla | 2026.04.01 - Changes : 2026.02.05-109 |
|
|
auto